Hey Friend, Can We Really Break the Laws of Economics? (Howard Marks Memo Summary)

Hey Friend, Can We Really Break the Laws of Economics? (Howard Marks Memo Summary)

I just read Howard Marks' latest memo, and wow – he's asking the kind of question that keeps me up at night.

 You know Howard Marks, right? The legendary investor who's been crushing it for decades. Well, he just dropped this thought bomb:

"There are basic economic laws tied to how people behave. And when we try to break or ignore them, things can go sideways fast."

It got me thinking about all the times we've tried to outsmart the system lately.

Grab your coffee ☕️ and let me walk you through some examples that'll make you go "oh, that makes sense now."

 

Rent Control – When Good Intentions Meet Reality

So rent is crazy expensive in cities like San Francisco and New York. The government steps in with rent control, saying, "You can't charge more than this amount." Sounds fair, right?

Here's what actually happens:

ü  Landlords stop maintaining properties (why spend money if you can't make it back?)

ü  Developers say "nope" to building new apartments

ü  Suddenly, there are even fewer places to live

It's like putting a Band-Aid on a leaking pipe – you feel good about doing something, but the problem just gets worse underneath.

 

California's Insurance Nightmare

This one really hits home. California's been getting hammered by wildfires, but when people tried to get fire insurance, companies started bailing out of the state. Why?

The government wouldn't let insurers raise their rates to match the actual risk. So insurance companies were stuck using outdated data while wildfires were getting worse every year. Eventually, they just said "we're out."

The result? People couldn't get coverage at any price. Turns out cheap insurance isn't worth much if you literally can't buy it when your house is about to burn down.

 

The Tariff Tango

Remember all the talk about tariffs bringing manufacturing back to America? The logic seemed solid:

ü  Protect U.S. jobs

ü  Fix trade imbalances

ü  Boost national security

But here's what actually happened:

  • Prices went up for everyday stuff we all buy
  • Without foreign competition, some companies got lazy about improving
  • We ended up helping a few industries while making life more expensive for everyone else

It's that classic "robbing Peter to pay Paul" situation.

 

The Debt Bomb Nobody Wants to Talk About

But here's what really got my attention – and honestly, it's the scariest part of Marks' memo. He points out that:

ü  The U.S. is running nearly $1.8 trillion deficits every year

ü  Social Security could run out of money by 2035

His analogy? "It's like someone falling from the 20th floor saying 'So far, so good' as they pass the 10th floor."

Ouch. That one stings because it's probably true.

 

So What's the Answer?

Look, Marks isn't saying the free market is perfect – far from it. But he makes a solid point: it's still the best system we've got for figuring out prices and getting resources where they need to go.

His approach?

  1. Let markets do their thing most of the time
  2. Step in to help people who genuinely need it
  3. Stop unfair behavior, but don't try to eliminate natural economic outcomes

 

My Take on All This

Here's what I think after reading all this: You can't boss around economics like it's your annoying little brother. The more you try to force it to behave, the more creative it gets at finding ways around your rules.

That doesn't mean we should just let people suffer when things go wrong. But maybe – just maybe – we need to work WITH economic forces instead of constantly fighting against them.

What do you think? Have you seen examples of this stuff in your own life? Hit me up in the comments – I'd love to hear your stories.


What's your take on economic intervention? Have you experienced any of these effects firsthand? Let's chat about it below.


You can read the full original memo by Howard Marks at the link below:
https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo/more-on-repealing-the-laws-of-economics

Comments